On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 21:59:57 +0100 Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote:
> If people do want to keep this port in the tree, I'd suggest > rearranging things so that the changes are grouped together as much > as possible (separate CONFIGURE_ARGS+= / LIB_DEPENDS+= blocks) to > make it more obvious which are the parts for the compiler change and > make it easier to switch back to a system compiler when upstream > updates it. > > Really not sure about the value of having early 2000's pirac^W file > sharing software in OpenBSD ports though ... I would be ok with removing it, too. Anyone else we should ask before killing it? -- http://gmerlin.de OpenPGP: http://gmerlin.de/christopher.pub CB07 DA40 B0B6 571D 35E2 0DEF 87E2 92A7 13E5 DEE1
pgpkSazC4uzG0.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature