On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 21:59:57 +0100
Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote:

> If people do want to keep this port in the tree, I'd suggest
> rearranging things so that the changes are grouped together as much
> as possible (separate CONFIGURE_ARGS+= / LIB_DEPENDS+= blocks) to
> make it more obvious which are the parts for the compiler change and
> make it easier to switch back to a system compiler when upstream
> updates it.
> 
> Really not sure about the value of having early 2000's pirac^W file
> sharing software in OpenBSD ports though ...

I would be ok with removing it, too. Anyone else we should ask before
killing it?

-- 
http://gmerlin.de
OpenPGP: http://gmerlin.de/christopher.pub
CB07 DA40 B0B6 571D 35E2  0DEF 87E2 92A7 13E5 DEE1

Attachment: pgpkSazC4uzG0.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to