On 2019/06/14 00:30, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13 2019, Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > CVSROOT: /cvs
> > Module name: ports
> > Changes by: [email protected] 2019/06/13 15:51:46
> >
> > Modified files:
> > databases/mariadb: Makefile
> >
> > Log message:
> > simplify multipackages again, now that they are reunited between
> > architectures.
> > from Brad.
>
> This is going in the wrong direction. Before revision 1.77
> mariadb-client had a chance to build on at least* hppa. I was so
> disappointed by the attitude of Brad regarding by this commit that
> I forgot to check all the changes for correctness.
Is there anyone with hppa who would like to try this? Or should we just
add it speculatively as I don't think there's really a downside ..
Index: Makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ports/databases/mariadb/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.79
diff -u -p -r1.79 Makefile
--- Makefile 13 Jun 2019 21:51:46 -0000 1.79
+++ Makefile 13 Jun 2019 23:30:40 -0000
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
# $OpenBSD: Makefile,v 1.79 2019/06/13 21:51:46 sthen Exp $
# archs with atomic ops
-ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= alpha aarch64 amd64 arm i386 mips64 mips64el powerpc
sparc64
+ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= alpha aarch64 amd64 arm hppa i386 mips64 mips64el
powerpc sparc64
COMMENT-main= multithreaded SQL database (client)
COMMENT-server= multithreaded SQL database (server)
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ LDFLAGS+= -L${LOCALBASE}/lib
CONFIGURE_ENV= LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS}"
-.if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "powerpc"
+.if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "powerpc" || ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "hppa"
LDFLAGS+= -latomic
WANTLIB+= atomic
.endif
