On 2019/04/25 00:14, Pascal Stumpf wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 16:52:57 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2019/04/23 17:14, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> > > With everybody eager to switch ports-gcc to gcc8, I'm still a bit
> > > hazy about which architectures gcc8 is actually known to work on.
> > > To the best of my knowledge:
> > > 
> > > should be fine
> > >     aarch64     already switched
> > >     amd64       successful bulk build
> > >     powerpc     successful partial build
> > >     sparc64     successful partial build
> > > 
> > > optimistic
> > >     hppa        existence of adastrap 8.3.0 suggests working compiler
> > >     mips64      existence of adastrap 8.2.0 suggests working compiler
> > >     mips64el    == mips64?
> > > 
> > > don't know
> > >     arm         ?
> > >     alpha       ? (don't care)
> > > 
> > > known bad
> > >     i386        marked BROKEN
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Christian "naddy" Weisgerber                          [email protected]
> > 
> > From the last snaps:
> > 
> > -rw-rw-r--  1 openbsd  openbsd  23870613 Apr 21 09:53 aarch64/gcc-8.3.0.tgz
> > -rw-rw-r--  1 openbsd  openbsd  28096948 Apr 21 18:07 amd64/gcc-8.3.0.tgz
> > -rw-rw-r--  1 openbsd  openbsd  27137929 Feb 25 05:54 arm/gcc-8.2.0p0.tgz
> > -rw-rw-r--  1 openbsd  openbsd  25484157 Apr  6 14:04 mips64/gcc-8.2.0p2.tgz
> > -rw-rw-r--  1 openbsd  openbsd  27639770 Mar 31 22:07 
> > powerpc/gcc-8.2.0p2.tgz
> > -rw-rw-r--  1 openbsd  openbsd  22927965 Mar 19 14:44 
> > sparc64/gcc-8.2.0p2.tgz
> > 
> > I'll try removing the BROKEN-i386 marker and building there in case anything
> > changed in the 8.3.0 update.
> > 
> > 
> 
> Won't build, but I'm on it.
> 

I'm doing a test build and assuming it works I'm going to switch this
to ld.bfd for now. I can't find the right way to get -Wl,-znotext added
to linker flags and I can't push new i386 packages with this broken, it
kills a quarter of the ports tree (mostly via fortran).

Reply via email to