On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 14:37:02 +0000 Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2019/03/14 14:32, Charlene Wendling wrote: > > Hi ports, > > > > > http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net/powerpc/2019-02-04/x11/kde4/marble.log > > > > Not much to say here, it's yet another case where it just > > needs -std=c++11. > > > > It builds [1] and runs fine [2] once provided. > > > > Any comment? > > I'm not the biggest fan of adding things after the bsd.port.mk > include, but it makes sense for now - OK. Once we'll use ports-gcc-8, some ports may need the opposite, i mean using -std=gnu++98, like x11/rxvt-unicode, sadly. There should be less of those though. > Maybe worth keeping a list of ports with forced -std=c++11 that we can > remove after switching? I "tagged" my changes with "ports-gcc>=8". If you have the_silver_searcher installed, they can be quickly found by issuing this: $ cd /usr/ports/; ag --ignore 'pobj/*' --silent -flQ 'ports-gcc>=8' graphics/openscenegraph/Makefile multimedia/mlt/Makefile print/texlive/base/patches/patch-texk_dvisvgm_dvisvgm-src_libs_brotli_common_platform_h print/texlive/base/patches/patch-texk_dvisvgm_dvisvgm-src_libs_brotli_include_brotli_port_h print/texlive/base/patches/patch-texk_dvisvgm_dvisvgm-src_libs_brotli_enc_fast_log_h In any case it's supposed to be the last one, unless landry pings me about now "unlocked" ports in his current bulk. Charlène.
