On 2018/10/08 12:12, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2018/10/08 09:37, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2018/10/07 16:05, [email protected] wrote:
> > > http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net//sparc64/2018-09-30/print/texlive/base.log
> >
> > Not new (same failure was present in 2018-07-31, but not in the previous
> > 2018-05-13 build), but that is annoying :(
> >
> > libxetex.a(libxetex_a-XeTeX_ext.o): In function `initversionstring':
> > XeTeX_ext.c:(.text+0x50c): undefined reference to `png_get_header_ver'
> > XeTeX_ext.c:(.text+0x5c0): undefined reference to `png_get_header_ver'
> > libxetex.a(libxetex_a-pngimage.o): In function `check_for_png':
> > pngimage.c:(.text+0xa0): undefined reference to `png_sig_cmp'
> > libxetex.a(libxetex_a-pngimage.o): In function `png_scan_file':
> > pngimage.c:(.text+0x130): undefined reference to `png_create_read_struct'
> > pngimage.c:(.text+0x140): undefined reference to `png_create_info_struct'
> > pngimage.c:(.text+0x154): undefined reference to `png_init_io'
> > pngimage.c:(.text+0x160): undefined reference to `png_read_info'
> > pngimage.c:(.text+0x16c): undefined reference to `png_get_image_width'
> > pngimage.c:(.text+0x17c): undefined reference to `png_get_image_height'
> > pngimage.c:(.text+0x18c): undefined reference to `png_get_bit_depth'
> > pngimage.c:(.text+0x19c): undefined reference to
> > `png_get_x_pixels_per_meter'
> > pngimage.c:(.text+0x1cc): undefined reference to
> > `png_get_y_pixels_per_meter'
> > pngimage.c:(.text+0x270): undefined reference to `png_destroy_info_struct'
> > pngimage.c:(.text+0x28c): undefined reference to `png_destroy_read_struct'
> > pngimage.c:(.text+0x2fc): undefined reference to `png_destroy_read_struct'
> > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> >
> > Does anyone have time to investigate?
> >
> > Guessing the libpng-1.6.35 update is the most likely cause.
> >
>
> Main difference in libpng-1.6.35 are png_size_t -> size_t change and build
> system regenerated with new autoconf/autobreak, and a lot of typo fixes,
> doesn't seem hugely likely to trigger this..
>
Well that's fun. I brought my semi-ancient spaceheater out of semi-retirement
(winter is coming anyway, so this makes sense) and tried a few things.
The following libtool command generates different output on various arches.
/usr/bin/libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link c++ -O2 -pipe -L/usr/local/lib
-L/usr/X11R6/lib -o xetex xetexdir/xetex-xetexextra.o
synctexdir/xetex-synctex.o xetex-xetexini.o xetex-xetex0.o xetex-xetex-pool.o
libxetex.a -L/usr/local/lib -lharfbuzz-icu -lharfbuzz -L/usr/local/lib
-lgraphite2 -L/usr/local/lib -licui18n -licuuc -licudata -lpthread -lm
/usr/obj/ports/texlive_base-2017/texlive-20170524-source/Work/libs/teckit/libTECkit.a
/usr/obj/ports/texlive_base-2017/texlive-20170524-source/Work/libs/poppler/libpoppler.a
-L/usr/local/lib -lpng -lz -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lfreetype -lz -lz libmd5.a
-L/usr/X11R6/lib -lfontconfig -lfreetype -lz lib/lib.a
/usr/obj/ports/texlive_base-2017/texlive-20170524-source/Work/texk/kpathsea/libkpathsea.la
-lm
Some of this is expected (differing c++ standard library), some not.
Both start with
libtool: link: c++ -o .libs/xetex -pthread -O2 -pipe
xetexdir/xetex-xetexextra.o synctexdir/xetex-synctex.o xetex-xetexini.o
xetex-xetex0.o xetex-xetex-pool.o libxetex.a
/usr/obj/ports/texlive_base-2017/texlive-20170524-source/Work/libs/teckit/libTECkit.a
/usr/obj/ports/texlive_base-2017/texlive-20170524-source/Work/libs/poppler/libpoppler.a
libmd5.a lib/lib.a -L.libs -lharfbuzz-icu -lm -licuuc -licudata -lharfbuzz
-lglib-2.0 -liconv -lpcre -lintl -lfreetype -lz
Then the next bit is different
SPARC64: ... -lgraphite2 -licui18n -lpthread -lstdc++ -lestdc++ -lfontconfig ...
AMD64: ... -lgraphite2 -lc++ -lc++abi -lpthread -licui18n -lpng -lfontconfig
...
And then finishing up with
-lexpat -lkpathsea -Wl,-rpath-link,/usr/local/lib,-rpath-link,/usr/X11R6/lib
I don't know what's going on but repeating the above libtool command line
using GNU libtool instead of the perl one in base, it manages to link xetex
successfully. I am now trying a texlive build with the diff below.
naddy, am I OK to commit this if my build succeeds?
Index: Makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ports/print/texlive/base/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.102
diff -u -p -r1.102 Makefile
--- Makefile 4 Sep 2018 12:46:20 -0000 1.102
+++ Makefile 9 Oct 2018 20:49:34 -0000
@@ -7,12 +7,11 @@ DISTNAME = texlive-${DIST_V}-source
PKGNAME = texlive_base-${V}
WRKDIST = ${WRKDIR}/texlive-${DIST_V}-source
-REVISION-main = 2
+REVISION = 3
MULTI_PACKAGES = -main -mktexlsr
PKGNAME-mktexlsr = texlive_mktexlsr-${V}
PKGNAME-main = ${PKGNAME}
-REVISION-mktexlsr = 0
DISTFILES = ${DISTNAME}${EXTRACT_SUFX} \
texlive-${DIST_V}-extra${EXTRACT_SUFX}
@@ -85,6 +84,8 @@ USE_GMAKE = Yes
.if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "sparc64"
CFLAGS += -fPIC
+# somehow base libtool misses -lpng while linking xetex
+USE_LIBTOOL = gnu
.endif
# clisp limits which arches we can use xindy on
