On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 01:05:27PM +0200, Charlène wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 11:44:16 +0200
> Landry Breuil wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 11:14:18AM +0200, Charlène wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > > 
> > > Here is an update for audio/abcde, that requires the updated
> > > www/p5-WebService-MusicBrainz and the new
> > > audio/p5-MusicBrainz-DiscID ports i've submitted earlier. 
> > > 
> > > We are currently several versions behind and the changelog is too
> > > huge to detail here [1]. The biggest changes:
> > > 
> > > - It now requires Perl to access the musicbrainz.org v2.0 API, that
> > > has become the default over CDDB (which is still available) to
> > > fetch tracks informations.
> > > - MP3 encoding now requires audio/py-eyed3 with the default
> > > configuration file. Our port only supports the default OGG Vorbis
> > > encoding, so it hasn't been added to the Makefile as a RUN_DEPENDS,
> > > but DESCR has been updated accordingly.
> > > 
> > > I also added a patch because abcde wasn't able to get tracks offsets
> > > from cdparanoia on OpenBSD and submitted a bug report to upstream
> > > [2] 
> > > 
> > > As usual, any comment is welcome! 
> > 
> > This is nice but how much has this been tested ? There were attempts
> > to update it in the past months, and it was busted (cf
> > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=151722260128733&w=2,
> > https://marc.info/?t=152149700300007&r=1&w=2) - a bug reporte was
> > opened upstream at
> > https://abcde.einval.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66.
> 
> What i've successfully tested, under chroot build and runtime indeed,
> but also on my own system: 
> 
> - Using a 2.7.2 default ~/.abcde.conf with a 2.9.2 build causes no
> issues
> - MusicBrainz works, and CDDB still works if you instruct abcde to use
> it instead
> - Encoding: vorbis, speex, flac, mp3, aiff. Standalone and combined
> ( -o ogg,mp3...)
> - `abcde 1 3-5` rips tracks 1, 3, 4, 5 as expected. 
> 
> Due to the vast amount of options available, everything cannot be
> tested, but if somebody has a feature not included here they need to
> test with that port update, and has no time to build it and its new
> dependencies, feel free to send me a test case!
> 
> > I dunno if that's the same issue, and if your patch from
> > https://abcde.einval.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86 fixes it, but it
> > would be nicer to clarify how much testing you've done :)
> > 
> 
> Oh, i should search the archive next time! The root issue is similar,
> but it has not the same consequences, on 2.9.1 and 2.9.2 it's a bash
> math evaluation failure instead. 

As long as it works and the runtime issues are fixed with those patches,
then i have no objections to the update :) The various ppl who proposed
(or requested) updates in the past months should chime in for testing
now...

Landry

Reply via email to