On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 10:34:17PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 13:48:12 +0200 > > From: Stefan Sperling <[email protected]> > ARM is "special". For the 32-bit ABI they designed their own variant > of the the unwinder ABI. When generating exception handling > information for this ABI, references to __aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr1 may > occur. GCC will resolve these by linking against libgcc_eh.a. For > Clang with compiler-rt I'm still not sure what the best approach is.
Thanks for explaning these details. > Anyway, do we actually support the backtrace functionality? As far as > I can tell tor needs glibc-compatible backtrace functionality which we > don't provide. So tis diff should be harmless in that respect. I don't need the backtrace feature. I don't understand what advantage it is supposed to provide over coredump files.
