On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 05:19:39PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25 2018, Frederic Cambus <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi ports@,
> >
> > We now have an up-to-date emulators/mame port for which we can build
> > and distribute binary packages for amd64 and i386. More information
> > here: https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=151514926004836&w=2
> >
> > I think it's time to remove emulators/sdlmame and emulators/sdlmess.
> > MAME and MESS merged in 2015 so emulators/mame contains both.
> >
> > Diff to add @pkgpath markers to emulators/mame and quirks entry below.
> >
> > Comments? OK to remove?
>
> Looks like you can't upgrade to mame if you have both sdlmame and
> sdlmess installed:
>
> env TRUSTED_PKG_PATH=/usr/ports/packages/amd64/all/ pkg_add -u
> [sdlmame-0.160p5]sdlmess-0.160p3->mame-0.197: internal conflict between
> mame-0.197 and sdlmame-0.160p5
>
> After removing sdlmame:
>
> env TRUSTED_PKG_PATH=/usr/ports/packages/amd64/all/ pkg_add -u
> sdlmess-0.160p3->mame-0.197: ok
>
> Dunno if that's a limitation in pkg_add or if some annotations/quirks
> are missing. Maybe espie knows better?
>
> I'm tempted to ok this anyway...
>
Oh, and does it perform the same if you keep sdlmame, and remove sdlmess
instead ?
