On Sat, Jan 20 2018, Antoine Jacoutot <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 02:18:53PM +0000, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
[...] >> * why isn't MODCMAKE_BUILD_SUFFIX properly substituted in all PLISTs? > > I think that's the main issue isn't it? > We can probably fix the framework to do so. Nope. This blurb about MODCMAKE_BUILD_SUFFIX not being substituted is just me being stupid. But given that I'm perfectly fine with being stupid, I'm not happy with a module overloading DEBUG, inserting random CFLAGS at upstream's will and triggering PLIST_DB changes. And I'm not the only one that has been bitten by this, I recall at least three other developers and one user losing time on this. So I'm advocating for less magic. :) -- jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE
