On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 08:57:40AM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 12:59:19AM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 15 2017, Landry Breuil <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:58:11PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > >> Hi All! > > >> > > >> After a long time and many setbacks I'm happy to send this mail. Please > > >> find > > >> attached a diff as tarball to update boost to the latest stable version > > >> 1.65.1. > > >> > > >> Notable port changes. > > >> > > >> - Of course bump all shared libs from 6.0 to 7.0. > > >> - COMPILER= base-clang ports-gcc (Replace ONLY_FOR_ARCHS) > > > > > > > > > Fwiw i fully support this moving on, eventual fallout can be dealt later > > > in-tree. But how much was it built-tested on a ports-gcc arch, at least > > > macppc|sparc64 ? :) > > > > Using Rafael's second tarball, it builds and packages fine on sparc64, > > games/bastet builds and runs (using ports-gcc or ports-clang, btw). > > The machine I'm doing tests on doesn't have much resources so don't > > expect more results. > > > > For $reasons I have not tried building the updated boost on arm yet, > > tarball currently unpacking... > > > > So not much to report, but I support this move. Anyone with more test > > results? > > Building it here on i386 incase it wasnt done..
And it built and packaged fine on i386 too.
