16 нояб. 2017 г. 6:48 пользователь "Anthony J. Bentley" <[email protected]> написал: > > Hi, > > The license marker in ru-ptsans says OFL, but I can't find any mention > of OFL either on the website or in the distfile. The "ParaType Free > Font Licensing Agreement" seems free enough though. > > We could probably swing PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM given the commercial > bundling allowance but might as well avoid any risk.
The story with OFL is somewhat complex. Originally those fonts were published under "ParaType Free Font Licensing Agreement", and both https://www.paratype.ru/public/ and https://www.paratype.com/public/ mention it. But then it was mentioned that OFL fonts would be available: https://paratype.livejournal.com/10009.html#cutid5 (sorry, Russian only), and then ParaType started publishing versions with OFL separately, e.g.: https://paratype.livejournal.com/21560.html (see the link at the end of posting). So, yes, those fonts have either ParaType own license, or OFL, but not both. Obviously, I've choosed OFL. :) http://www.fontstock.com/public/PTSansOFL.zip > While here, switch homepage/master_sites to https. Yep. I've switched this server to https a week or two ago, and you already found it. :)
