> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 1:01 PM, Marc Espie <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Then there are a number of /pt_BR/ in addition to /pt/. > >> That looks suspicious, but i don't speak Portuguese, > >> so it may or may not make sense, i don't really know. > > > > I don't think BR makes sense, but I'll let portuguese/brazillians chime in. > > > > Brazilian user chiming in: we understand Portuguese from Portugal just > fine but some differences are quite evident to us, so we'd definitely > prefer a local version when available.
colour/color gray/grey. I can handle stuff like that, you can handle it also. The problem is internationalization efforts are far from free. It is a lot of work by unqualified people, leading to development feedback loops which are long and error prone, resulting in other far more important development efforts not receiving their due. There is no "one framework" that can pick the right files. Even the upstreams don't have a single selection roadmap, and force each downstream to make some decisions. Major downstreams are far better funded, ie. receiving actual revenue. Ingo's proposals are trying to help you by simplifying things so they are manageable rather than OpenBSD choosing to go English-only. How many of your realize we are only 10 minutes from having the Balkan community pipe up. Don't know the story? That's why the openbsd web pages are only in english now, they used to have copies of all other languages but those got removed. Why? Language groups fought email battles and we of the english majority _DOING ALL THE WORK_ said we the minority has no right to assign work. The other languages were removed. Actual participation isn't built upon complaints. Careful what you ask for. Your requests may smell like demands. Demands aren't well received.
