On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 02:41:26PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> With this PERMIT_* I'm not sure if it's really worth bothering with.
>
>
> Index: Makefile
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/textproc/agrep/Makefile,v
> retrieving revision 1.24
> diff -u -p -r1.24 Makefile
> --- Makefile 17 Mar 2016 21:14:46 -0000 1.24
> +++ Makefile 11 Apr 2017 13:39:54 -0000
> @@ -13,10 +13,15 @@ EXTRACT_SUFX= .tar.Z
> PERMIT_PACKAGE_FTP= may not modify
> PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM= no fee
> PERMIT_DISTFILES_FTP= Yes
> +
> WANTLIB= c
>
> -MAKE_FLAGS= CC="${CC}" CFLAGS="${CFLAGS}"
> +.include <bsd.port.arch.mk>
> +.if ${PROPERTIES:Mclang}
> +CFLAGS+= -Wno-return-type --std=gnu89
> +.endif
>
> +MAKE_FLAGS= CC="${CC}" CFLAGS="${CFLAGS}"
> ALL_TARGET=
>
> NO_TEST= Yes
I'm pretty sure the licence is an oversight. Anyone tried contacting the
authors yet ?...
