On 2016/06/17 09:40, Marcus Glocker wrote:
> Sending patches upstream has lead to taking maintainership of irssi-icb.
> Therefore what I did now:
>
> * Synced mglocker/irssi-icb with ailin-nemui/irssi-icb.
> * Applied both our ports patches to mglocker/irssi-icb.
something (likely a missing include) was wrong with the
src/fe-common/fe-icb.c patch, and as Ailin pointed out the
extra param should just be ignored anyway. Could you apply
this either to the repo or to the port? Then it's ok with me.
To test, just send yourself a /m.
--- src/fe-common/fe-icb.c.orig Thu Jun 23 21:05:38 2016
+++ src/fe-common/fe-icb.c Thu Jun 23 21:05:41 2016
@@ -120,12 +120,8 @@ static void event_personal(ICB_SERVER_REC *server, con
char **args;
args = icb_split(data, 2);
-#if IRSSI_VERSION_DATE > 20141206
signal_emit("message private", 5, server, args[1], args[0], "",
server->nick);
-#else
- signal_emit("message private", 4, server, args[1], args[0], "");
-#endif
icb_split_free(args);
}
