On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 02:07:23PM +0100, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: > this is a diff I've had since years and I never went to try it. > Tests welcome. > > Index: Makefile > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/ports/news/nn/Makefile,v > retrieving revision 1.12 > diff -u -p -r1.12 Makefile > --- Makefile 24 Nov 2015 09:11:05 -0000 1.12 > +++ Makefile 11 Mar 2016 13:02:30 -0000 > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ > > COMMENT = No News is Good News (Fast CLI Point & Read Newsreader) > DISTNAME = nn-6.7.3 > -REVISION = 1 > +REVISION = 2 > CATEGORIES = news > HOMEPAGE = http://www.nndev.org > > Index: files/s-openbsd.h > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/ports/news/nn/files/s-openbsd.h,v > retrieving revision 1.1.1.1 > diff -u -p -r1.1.1.1 s-openbsd.h > --- files/s-openbsd.h 17 Nov 2008 08:42:13 -0000 1.1.1.1 > +++ files/s-openbsd.h 11 Mar 2016 13:02:30 -0000 > @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ > * Define if a signal handler has type void (see signal.h) > */ > > -/* #define SIGNAL_HANDLERS_ARE_VOID /* */ > +#define SIGNAL_HANDLERS_ARE_VOID /* */ > > /* > * Define if signals must be set again after they are caught
Thanks for this. I've not been keeping up on this, but if this is in fact the way that OpenBSD does signal handlers, then that's a good patch. As long as tests from others turn out okay, it has my okay. -- Aaron W. Hsu | [email protected] | http://www.sacrideo.us
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
