thanks for that (both of you). perhaps some change to pkg_add(1) is in order to fix that line.
On Sun, 14 Dec 2014 15:49:18 -0700 "Anthony J. Bentley" <[email protected]> wrote: > Jiri B writes: > > On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 05:24:46PM -0500, [email protected] wrote: > > > in pkg_add(1) there is this line: > > > > > > 4. All package dependencies (from @depend and @wantlib directives; > > > s > > ee > > > pkg_create(1)) are read from the packing-list. If any of these > > > > > > but there is no reference to @wantlib in pkg_create(1) (or any other > > > port/p > > kg > > > related manpage i checked). > > > > $ mandoc -Tascii /usr/share/man/man1/pkg_create.1 | col -b | \ > > sed -n '/^[[:blank:]]*@wantlib/,/^$/p' > > @wantlib libspec > > Package needs a shared library to work. libspec is > > `name.major.minor' or `path/name.major.minor'. The package > > won' > > t > > be installed unless a library with the same name, the exact > > same > > major number and at least the same minor number can be located. > > A library without path is searched through dependent packages > > under the same localbase, then in the system libraries under > > /usr/lib and /usr/X11R6/lib. A library with a path is only > > searched through dependent packages, that path being relative > > to > > localbase. does this paragraph still hold true though? > > This text no longer exists in pkg_create(1) since revision 1.85. Well, > it does, but under -W. @wantlib is now documented under package(5) > because it's meant to be an internal annotation, not for users. > > -- > Anthony J. Bentley >
