Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas said:
> > IIRC this problem does not manifest itself with glibc.
>
> Does that mean that those settings are passed directly to printf-like
> functions?
Yes. Relevant part of source code is this fragment of "src/html.c":
77 if (path && headpath)
78 {
79 /* load head */
80 g_file_get_contents(headpath, &filecontent, NULL, NULL);
81 g_string_append_printf(content, filecontent, t->title);
82 g_free(filecontent);
83 /* load content */
84 g_file_get_contents(path, &filecontent, NULL, NULL);
85 if (panel)
86 g_string_append_printf(content, filecontent, panel);
87
88
webkit_web_frame_load_alternate_string(webkit_web_view_get_main_frame(wv),
content->str, current_uri, current_uri);
89 g_string_free(content, true);
90 g_free(filecontent);
91 ret = STATUS_OK;
92 }
On lines 81 and 86 the contents of these HTML templates is passed to
g_string_append_printf() as templates. Apparently our printf functions
strip '%' charecters when encounter invalid conversion specifications,
while GNU counterparts leave them alone.
--
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
