On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 05:27:40AM -0500, Brad Smith wrote: > On 07/12/13 4:41 AM, Landry Breuil wrote: > >On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 03:26:55PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote: > >>On 05/12/13 3:35 AM, Brad Smith wrote: > >>>Here is a work in progress update to LLVM 3.4. This has only been lightly > >>>tested on amd64. I need this build tested on i386, powerpc, sparc64 and > >>>mips64 to start off. If you have such an arch please try building it as > >>>soon as possible as I'd like to report any issues upstream if there are > >>>any. Any runtime testing feedback would also be appreciated. > >> > >>Still looking for build tests for sparc64 and mips64. > > > >It builds and packages on sparc64: > > > >$make test > >===> Regression tests for llvm-3.4rc2 > >ninja: error: unknown target 'RUNTESTFLAGS=' > > I have a diff pending with Stuart to fix the regression tests. That > was broken after the switch to CMake. > > >And it still fails to pass firefox's configure script: > > Mozilla's autoconf infrastructure for whatever reason is not detecting that > that is Clang and running autoconf checks for GCC on Clang which it should > not be. I would need to see the full autoconf run up to that > point to see if we can spot where things go wrong. The autoconf script > from the bits I looked at seems to be able to determine GCC vs Clang > but I didn't come across the actual tests to see how it does so.
Yet it has no issue on amd64 with clang 3.3. Landry
