On 2013/04/19 14:53, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Well, that was anticlimactic. Here's the update to jpeg 9. > > For some reason I was expecting significant API changes, but this > merely adds support for a reversible color transform to improve > compression of RGB images. > > Major bump because of a struct change and error code renumbering. > Yes, the upstream version has gone backwards. libtool is hard. > I don't see anything that would warrant a bulk build.
Looks pretty safe to me, I suppose they bumped the major because the reversible colour transform can't be used by older versions, and some people may get less confused by "file needs jpeg 9" than "file needs jpeg 8e or newer" > OK? yes.
