On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 07:59:05PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote: > gdevcups.c: offsetof(gx_device, icc_struct) = 500 > gdevcups.c: sizeof(gx_color_index) = 4 > gsicc_manage.c: offsetof(gx_device, icc_struct) = 640 > gsicc_manage.c: sizeof(gx_color_index) = 8 > > This looks like some #include and/or #define fuckup (ghostscript > is heavily abusing the preprocessor in very bad ways, to simulate > something like inheritance and also to make it unmaintainable and > unreadable). > insanity...
- Re: ghostscript segfaults with cups raster device Martin Crossley
- Re: ghostscript segfaults with cups raster device Matthias Kilian
- Re: ghostscript segfaults with cups raster devic... Matthias Kilian
- Re: ghostscript segfaults with cups raster device Martin Crossley
- Re: ghostscript segfaults with cups raster device Stuart Henderson
- Re: ghostscript segfaults with cups raster devic... Martin Crossley
- Re: ghostscript segfaults with cups raster device Martin Crossley
- Re: ghostscript segfaults with cups raster device Matthias Kilian
- Re: ghostscript segfaults with cups raster devic... Martin Crossley
- Re: ghostscript segfaults with cups raster d... Matthias Kilian
- Re: ghostscript segfaults with cups rast... Martin Crossley
- Re: ghostscript segfaults with cups rast... Matthias Kilian
- Re: ghostscript segfaults with cups... Martin Crossley
- Re: ghostscript segfaults with ... Matthias Kilian
- Re: ghostscript segfaults with ... David Coppa
- Re: ghostscript segfaults with ... Martin Crossley
