Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> writes: [...]
> Any particular reason for the separate flavour for libedit? > libedit is in base anyway, so it seems more sensible to just > enable it by default. I had none, except that I thought it has not been much tested (most distros ship dash without it, afaik). $ ls -lh /usr/obj/pobj/dash-0.5.7/fake-i386*/usr/local/bin/dash -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 541K Jan 10 16:12 /usr/obj/pobj/dash-0.5.7/fake-i386-libedit-static/usr/local/bin/dash* -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 83.9K Jan 10 16:10 /usr/obj/pobj/dash-0.5.7/fake-i386-libedit/usr/local/bin/dash* -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 281K Jan 10 16:12 /usr/obj/pobj/dash-0.5.7/fake-i386-static/usr/local/bin/dash* -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 79.1K Jan 10 16:09 /usr/obj/pobj/dash-0.5.7/fake-i386/usr/local/bin/dash* One could argue that it makes the static binary twice as large. If that isn't a problem I'll just enable libedit by default and get rid of the flavor. This would make it easier to know whether all flavors should be linked to the build by default. :) > Otherwise, OK with me. -- Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas GPG Key fingerprint: 61DB D9A0 00A4 67CF 2A90 8961 6191 8FBF 06A1 1494
