On 2012/05/07 12:18, Jan Stary wrote: > > What is the benefit? Using sthen's method we can save a patch. > > We need to patch the orig Makefile anyway, > and this makes the port's Makefile simpler.
I'm trying to avoid much patching. The 'ifeq OpenBSD' bit can go upstream as-is, and I don't mind keeping the CFLAGS change locally as it's an easy 1-liner and won't be a problem to keep in sync, but I would like to avoid patching lines which are more likely to change upstream. > > > Also, the mv line moves all man directories of all packages > > > that have installed there, which is none of its bussines. > > > > Huh? I think you are totally confused :) > > That's well possible. > > Let's say I have /usr/local/share/man/man1/prog.1 > (however it got there from some third-site, unported software). > > Now I make install dos2unix. The post-install portion > of Stuart's Makefile moves prog.1 which it has nothing > to do with. Is that correct? > > Oh. This happens in the fake prefix, right? Excuse moi. > > Jan > Yes, this is in fake.
