On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2011/06/14 11:09, Marc Espie wrote: >> > most ports should have libexecinfo as an optional dependency... >> > btw, why marco's backtrace library is not in ports? After we have >> > removed libexecinfo (if we decide to do so) we could use it as a >> > libexecinfo replacement. Just my 2 cents... >> >> If both libraries offer the same functionality, doing a frontend api to >> libbacktrace to do what libexecinfo does would be cool... > > IIRC it implements the same functions, so I think we can just rename it.
cool. Then I'm all in favor of taking this route. ciao, david
