On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:28:27PM -0800, Jeremy Evans wrote:
> On 01/10 09:22, Marc Espie wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:39:23AM -0800, Jeremy Evans wrote:
> > > On 01/08 09:35, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > > On 2011/01/07 17:08, Jeremy Evans wrote:
> > > > > Three diffs included. First is llvm-gcc.  Second is an updated llvm
> > > > > diff that should reduce future PLIST churn, requested by Mikolaj
> > > > > Kucharski. Third is a diff to enable llvm support in rubinius.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I haven't yet checked to see if any of the llvm-gcc shared libs should
> > > > > be bumped.  Any advice in this area?
> > > > 
> > > > Bumping these libs will need some work with the build infrastructure,
> > > > unfortunately we don't have this under control yet (see notes in
> > > > llvm-gcc4 Makefile).
> > >  
> > > Since this isn't under control of the build infrastructure and upstream
> > > didn't bump them, can we just leave them alone?
> > 
> > No.
> > 
> > Upstream(s) are notoriously bad at bumping when need occurs.
> 
> Any objections to me just bumping the majors on all three shared libs?
> There aren't any dependencies to worry about.

I would very much like for them to be put under control of the infrastructure,
as should be.

Reply via email to