On 2010/01/12 21:55, Stephan Tesch wrote: > Stuart Henderson schrieb: > > Hello Stuart, > > Doesn't seem to work here: > > Freshly pulled cvs source for ports brings the following:
I guess it got mangled on the way to your MUA; it works for me pulling it out of marc.info's archive: <st...@zoo:/tmp:2>$ acvs -q get -P -d sa ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin U sa/Makefile U sa/distinfo U sa/files/OpenBSD-SpamAssassin-mini-howto.html U sa/patches/patch-Makefile_PL U sa/patches/patch-rules_72_active_cf U sa/patches/patch-sa-update_raw U sa/pkg/DESCR U sa/pkg/PLIST <st...@zoo:/tmp:3>$ cd sa <st...@zoo:/tmp:4>$ ftp -o- 'http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=126332727021192&q=raw' | patch -p0 -E Trying 63.238.77.172... Requesting http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=126332727021192&q=raw 39065 bytes received in 0.43 seconds (88.19 KB/s) Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |SpamAssassin users, here's an update to the unofficial 3.3.0-rc2. |The final 3.3.0 release should be along quite soon (maybe Friday). |Please test and report any problems asap. beta1/rc1 have been |working well for me with MailScanner. | |Note if you're upgrading: | |- FreeMail, PhishTag and Reuse are now included in the main |SA distribution, remove any external copies | |- The AWL plugin is no longer loaded by default, you must load it |explicitly should you want to use it. | | |Index: Makefile |=================================================================== |RCS file: /cvs/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin/Makefile,v |retrieving revision 1.59 |diff -u -p -r1.59 Makefile |--- Makefile 1 Jan 2010 22:41:15 -0000 1.59 |+++ Makefile 12 Jan 2010 19:45:37 -0000 -------------------------- Patching file Makefile using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hunk #2 succeeded at 27. Hunk #3 succeeded at 72. Hunk #4 succeeded at 80. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: distinfo |=================================================================== |RCS file: /cvs/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin/distinfo,v |retrieving revision 1.34 |diff -u -p -r1.34 distinfo |--- distinfo 4 Sep 2008 06:42:12 -0000 1.34 |+++ distinfo 12 Jan 2010 19:45:37 -0000 -------------------------- Patching file distinfo using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: files/OpenBSD-SpamAssassin-mini-howto.html |=================================================================== |RCS file: /cvs/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin/files/OpenBSD-SpamAssassin-mini-howto.html,v |retrieving revision 1.9 |diff -u -p -r1.9 OpenBSD-SpamAssassin-mini-howto.html |--- files/OpenBSD-SpamAssassin-mini-howto.html 21 Oct 2006 19:26:14 -0000 1.9 |+++ files/OpenBSD-SpamAssassin-mini-howto.html 12 Jan 2010 19:45:37 -0000 -------------------------- Patching file files/OpenBSD-SpamAssassin-mini-howto.html using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 6. Hunk #2 succeeded at 33. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: patches/patch-Makefile_PL |=================================================================== |RCS file: /cvs/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin/patches/patch-Makefile_PL,v |retrieving revision 1.10 |diff -u -p -r1.10 patch-Makefile_PL |--- patches/patch-Makefile_PL 23 Oct 2009 10:26:18 -0000 1.10 |+++ patches/patch-Makefile_PL 12 Jan 2010 19:45:37 -0000 -------------------------- Patching file patches/patch-Makefile_PL using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: patches/patch-rules_72_active_cf |=================================================================== |RCS file: patches/patch-rules_72_active_cf |diff -N patches/patch-rules_72_active_cf |--- patches/patch-rules_72_active_cf 1 Jan 2010 22:41:15 -0000 1.1 |+++ /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000 -------------------------- Patching file patches/patch-rules_72_active_cf using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 failed at 0. 1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to patches/patch-rules_72_active_cf.rej Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: patches/patch-sa-update_raw |=================================================================== |RCS file: patches/patch-sa-update_raw |diff -N patches/patch-sa-update_raw |--- patches/patch-sa-update_raw 4 Sep 2008 06:42:12 -0000 1.5 |+++ /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000 -------------------------- Patching file patches/patch-sa-update_raw using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 0. Removing patches/patch-sa-update_raw (empty after patching). Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: pkg/DESCR |=================================================================== |RCS file: pkg/DESCR |diff -N pkg/DESCR |--- pkg/DESCR 31 Oct 2004 08:44:44 -0000 1.3 |+++ /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000 -------------------------- Patching file pkg/DESCR using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 0. Removing pkg/DESCR (empty after patching). Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: pkg/DESCR-main |=================================================================== |RCS file: pkg/DESCR-main |diff -N pkg/DESCR-main |--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000 |+++ pkg/DESCR-main 12 Jan 2010 19:45:37 -0000 -------------------------- (Creating file pkg/DESCR-main...) Patching file pkg/DESCR-main using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: pkg/DESCR-rules |=================================================================== |RCS file: pkg/DESCR-rules |diff -N pkg/DESCR-rules |--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000 |+++ pkg/DESCR-rules 12 Jan 2010 19:45:37 -0000 -------------------------- (Creating file pkg/DESCR-rules...) Patching file pkg/DESCR-rules using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: pkg/PLIST |=================================================================== |RCS file: pkg/PLIST |diff -N pkg/PLIST |--- pkg/PLIST 1 Oct 2008 19:30:39 -0000 1.26 |+++ /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000 -------------------------- Patching file pkg/PLIST using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 0. Removing pkg/PLIST (empty after patching). Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: pkg/PLIST-main |=================================================================== |RCS file: pkg/PLIST-main |diff -N pkg/PLIST-main |--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000 |+++ pkg/PLIST-main 12 Jan 2010 19:45:37 -0000 -------------------------- (Creating file pkg/PLIST-main...) Patching file pkg/PLIST-main using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: pkg/PLIST-rules |=================================================================== |RCS file: pkg/PLIST-rules |diff -N pkg/PLIST-rules |--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000 |+++ pkg/PLIST-rules 12 Jan 2010 19:45:37 -0000 -------------------------- (Creating file pkg/PLIST-rules...) Patching file pkg/PLIST-rules using Plan A... Empty context always matches. Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. done
