On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 10:07:05AM +0100, Andreas Vögele wrote: > Cesare Gargano writes: > > > Oh, I agree... I forgot to apply your patch, sorry :( > > This could be ok? > > > > Cesare > > > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 06:49:42PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 05:13:21PM +0000, Cesare Gargano wrote: > >>> Hi! > >>> This updates p5-Alien-wxWidgets to 0.47 > >>> > >>> I replaced a 1 with a 2 in the patch, > >>> I don't like their method to get our wxWidgets version ;( > >> No, sorry, this won't work. Please keep the patch as is. > >> > >> There is a reason i did it that way : we want to be able to update > >> wxwidgets without breaking/patching alien-wxwidgets. > >> > >> I don't care if you like it or not, but hardcoding so versions like this > >> in patches is a sure way to break things at one moment. > >> > >> Landry > > BTW, upstream is interested in getting Alien::wxWidgets fixed on > OpenBSD. Some time ago James Wright created a bug report, which is > available at L<https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=41678>.
Yeah, i was aware of the RT ticket, i just forgot about it lately - i just doubt upstream will like the way i fixed the issue (ie look for all libxxx.so.x.y files, and for each xxx lib take the biggest number). If you have a rt account you can still link mattia barbon to the patch (ports/devel/p5-Alien-wxWidgets/patches/patch-inc_My_Build_Any_wx_config_Bakefile_pm) and see what he thinks about it, i won't have time to handle this before some weeks. Landry
