On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 06:03:50AM +0200, frantisek holop wrote: > hmm, on Mon, May 04, 2009 at 09:08:40PM -0600, Theo de Raadt said that > > I don't have to bring up any good reasons for some random person on > > the mailing lists feels "entitled". > > this approach is broken. > > "some random person on the mailing list" slash ocasional > contributor slash bug reporter slash tester if i may please. > > you are full of shit. this is not about me. > you are twisting my words. > > > You are a whiny snively jerk, and every time you open your mouth I go > > work on something else. > > as "some random person on the mailing list" you sure insulted me > more times than i can remember. in my country that kind of trash > talk implies you stand up to your words. man enough to say it into > my eyes? hm? how about a one on one mountain man? hm?
well, this is obviously not your country. > you are a pigdog-man who hides behind insults from the safe distance > of a terminal. ni! <insert chicken-sound here> > > but you will not drive me away, and i will try and help make this > system better even if you kicked and screamed, you hysty. > because i dont mind your attitude at all, i judge a system by its > quality not by its leader. and i think you are basically a good > man at the core, a man with qualities like integrity, consistence, > but maybe not charisma. but just like everybody else, sometimes > you are an idiot. blah blah blah. > if the price of good, secure code is that you once in a while shout > at people for little apparent reason, i am glad i helped to pay the > price! god bless canada. > > oi! i might get hostile now a bit! > > -f > ps. this email really works only if you read it aloud in mock > monthy python english > -- > after two weeks of dieting, all i lost was two weeks. > -- DISCLAIMER: http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/ This message will self-destruct in 3 seconds.
