On 2008/07/01 11:21, Roberto FERNANDEZ wrote: > Don't know if my vote counts but here it is. > > normalize +1 > daemontools dependency -1
Then it wouldn't be DJBDNS, and you are going against the author's wishes, and you are making things more difficult for users, some of whom *will*, whatever you tell them, try and follow a mixture of docs. Using this will suck. Answering emails asking for help will suck too (don't forget they won't just come on ports@, but also on djbdns-related mailing lists). If you're looking for a good normal DNS server that isn't BIND, we have good ones in ports; nsd (an authoritative server) and unbound (a caching recursive resolver). If you have chosen to use DJBDNS it's going to be based on reading about it beforehand, and then you will already know it is going to be "different"...
