On Thursday 20 March 2008 14:49:02 Dave Mangot wrote: > I was reading a comparison on the SipX website of Asterisk (which > is in ports) vs. SipX. > > I thought OpenBSD users would get a good laugh as to one of the > reasons SipX says it's better. > > From: > http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/Comparing_sipX_with_Asterisk > > Size of the Code Base: In spite of its younger age, the sipX code base > is about twice the number of lines of code as compared to Asterisk > (890,000 vs. 488,000). > > > All OpenBSD users know that having twice as many lines of code > automatically makes a better piece of software. ;) > > -Dave
It does not take much to be better than a pile of shit like Asterisk. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
