On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 06:51:58AM -0400, Olivier Cherrier wrote: > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 09:21:16AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> http://www.symacx.com/data/software/OpenBSD/shmux.taz > > > > Not very important but..: > > > > - You could also reuse homepage to define master_sites. > > i.e. MASTER_SITES=${HOMEPAGE}/dist/ > > Done. > > > - Also, the RCS tag is wrong, it should be $OpenBSD$ (without the ':' you > > added). > > Done. > It works without any problem with the ':'. That's the case with GNU cvs > as well as OpenCVS. > When the variable has been expanded, it looks like: > $OpenBSD: Makefile,v 1.49 2006/02/08 17:27:49 steven Exp $ > > > - As for the strlcpy and friends patches, we decided not to bother with > > this for ports as I makes the maintenance more complicated. You are > > encouraged to put them upstream though ;-) > > OK, I will do it. > For now, I just stripped down the patches. > Archive updated.
And it seems that it has fping as a hidden RUN_DEPENDS (use -P switch), but wh ship it as only executable by root.. Also, i'd prefer ALL_TARGET=shmux for the sake of clarification, and also REGRESS_TARGET=test to have make regress happy. Simon@ pointed out that PERMIT_DISTFILE_CDROM could be set to no, as clause (1) speaks about 'reasonable fee'.. but anyway we don't ship distfiles on CDROM. I'm not a licence expert, but this licence scares me. Landry
