Hi! On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 12:41:29PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: >On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Hannah Schroeter wrote: >>Seems people reported problems with kqemu, so I'm not in favor of >>dropping the non-kqemu variant.
>The point is that qemu should work fine with or without kqemu with no >need of a FLAVOR. >Even if compiled with support for kqemu, qemu will proceed in software >mode is the kernel module is not loaded. >If this works fine like that, then the non-kqemu variant should be >dropped. Can one, then, also disable kqemu in the kqemu variant of qemu even when the kqemu kernel module is loaded, e.g. with a command line option? E.g. if I'm a non-root user on a box and I've noticed that there's subtle behavior difference that is bad for me? Kind regards, Hannah.
