> [..] > > > > If you look at the whole thread, having a flavor was the original > > idea from the OP, so if more people consider it the best option, > > we should have a look at it instead of trying to make this port > > a multipackage. > > > > Comments on the original diff ? > > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=119456375313172&w=2 > > We take this as a starting point and add a no_x11 flavor ? > > I've read the whole thread and my point is that it's perfectly fine to > have a no_x11 flavor (as opposed to other people's opinion). > I've looked at it quickly and looks fine except for the BINARIES > define that seems unneeded/unused but I will try it and comment as > soon as I can.
Builds and works fine here. Tested on amd64. the BINARIES define can be removed. f.-
