On 2025/03/23 22:59, Florian Viehweger wrote: > Am Fri, 21 Mar 2025 16:00:03 +0000 > schrieb Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org>: > > > On 2025/03/03 22:32, Florian Viehweger wrote: > > > Am Sun, 2 Mar 2025 14:14:59 +0000 > > > schrieb Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org>: > > > > > > > I do think we need to do _something_ with this, because as things > > > > stand, if an i386 user has fish as their shell, they will be left > > > > with old binaries which will stop working sometime. If not going > > > > for this approach then we'll need something in current.html / > > > > release notes so that people can change their user's shell in > > > > advance of upgrading. > > > > > > I like the proposal splitting fish into v3 and v4. Within this week > > > I'll prepare a diff and send it to ports@. > > > > > > Thanks again for the idea! > > > > If we don't get something for this soon, it will be too late for > > release and we'll need to go with the warning and hope people read > > release notes ;) > > I've made the suggested changes, however I'm missing something here. > > According to the documentation only 'main' should be built without > arguments. However both versions are built. What am I doing wrong here?
Which documentation? These are separate ports, if you are in shells/fish and type "make" then it will simply recurse to v3 and main, this is expected. It is expected that both versions will be built; the fiddly bit is the placement of the "@pkgpath shells/fish" marker in the PLIST so that pkg_add -u works as expected. Tweaked version attached. What's the purpose of the gnugetopt run dependency? It doesn't seem to be used in either v3 or v4..
fish.tgz
Description: application/tar-gz
