On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:55:29 +0100, Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote: > > [1 <text/plain; us-ascii (8bit)>] > should those files actually be added, or should they have @comment'ed > like many of the others in this port? >
With 'go ahead' from tb@ I had commited it with this files. Mainly because bin/tmc here misslead me. What do you think about this? Lu? Index: Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/security/nuclei/Makefile,v diff -u -p -r1.4 Makefile --- Makefile 20 Feb 2025 11:56:37 -0000 1.4 +++ Makefile 20 Feb 2025 14:08:05 -0000 @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ COMMENT = fast and customizable vulnera MODGO_MODNAME = github.com/projectdiscovery/nuclei/v3 MODGO_VERSION = v3.3.9 +REVISION = 0 DISTNAME = nuclei-${MODGO_VERSION} Index: pkg/PLIST =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/security/nuclei/pkg/PLIST,v diff -u -p -r1.3 PLIST --- pkg/PLIST 20 Feb 2025 11:56:37 -0000 1.3 +++ pkg/PLIST 20 Feb 2025 14:08:59 -0000 @@ -4,9 +4,9 @@ @comment bin/fuzzplayground @comment bin/generate-checksum @comment bin/integration-test -@bin bin/memogen +@comment bin/memogen @bin bin/nuclei @comment bin/sign-templates -@bin bin/scan-charts -@bin bin/signer -@bin bin/tmc +@comment bin/scan-charts +@comment bin/signer +@comment bin/tmc -- wbr, Kirill