On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 14:55:29 +0100,
Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote:
> 
> [1  <text/plain; us-ascii (8bit)>]
> should those files actually be added, or should they have @comment'ed
> like many of the others in this port?
>

With 'go ahead' from tb@ I had commited it with this files.

Mainly because bin/tmc here misslead me.

What do you think about this? Lu?

Index: Makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/security/nuclei/Makefile,v
diff -u -p -r1.4 Makefile
--- Makefile    20 Feb 2025 11:56:37 -0000      1.4
+++ Makefile    20 Feb 2025 14:08:05 -0000
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ COMMENT =               fast and customizable vulnera
 
 MODGO_MODNAME =                github.com/projectdiscovery/nuclei/v3
 MODGO_VERSION =                v3.3.9
+REVISION =             0
 
 DISTNAME =             nuclei-${MODGO_VERSION}
 
Index: pkg/PLIST
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/security/nuclei/pkg/PLIST,v
diff -u -p -r1.3 PLIST
--- pkg/PLIST   20 Feb 2025 11:56:37 -0000      1.3
+++ pkg/PLIST   20 Feb 2025 14:08:59 -0000
@@ -4,9 +4,9 @@
 @comment bin/fuzzplayground
 @comment bin/generate-checksum
 @comment bin/integration-test
-@bin bin/memogen
+@comment bin/memogen
 @bin bin/nuclei
 @comment bin/sign-templates
-@bin bin/scan-charts
-@bin bin/signer
-@bin bin/tmc
+@comment bin/scan-charts
+@comment bin/signer
+@comment bin/tmc


-- 
wbr, Kirill

Reply via email to