OK
On 2025 Jan 10 (Fri) at 17:53:19 +0100 (+0100), Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
:
:Running a full bulk build on an apple M2, I see lots of failures due
:to code generated by lang/gcc/8,-f95 not being BT compliant, resulting
:in SIGILL crashes. Moving to lang/gcc/11 may help fix this, but we're
:not there yet.
:
:The bulk of those failures is easily fixed by the diff below. I think
:it's cleaner to address this in a single place instead of sprinkling
:USE_NOBTCFI-aarch64 everywhere. The diffs to bump the g95 consumers
:are not included.
:
:Feedback & oks welcome.
:
:
:Index: fortran.port.mk
:===================================================================
:RCS file: /cvs/ports/infrastructure/mk/fortran.port.mk,v
:diff -u -p -r1.17 fortran.port.mk
:--- fortran.port.mk 27 Aug 2019 14:30:38 -0000 1.17
:+++ fortran.port.mk 10 Jan 2025 16:52:52 -0000
:@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ MODGCC4_LANGS += fortran
: MODFORTRAN_BUILD_DEPENDS += ${MODGCC4_FORTRANDEP}
: MODFORTRAN_LIB_DEPENDS += ${MODGCC4_FORTRANLIBDEP}
: MODFORTRAN_WANTLIB += ${MODGCC4_FORTRANWANTLIB}
:+# XXX revisit when we move to lang/gcc/11
:+USE_NOBTCFI-aarch64 ?= Yes
: .elif ${MODFORTRAN_COMPILER:L} == "flang"
: MODFORTRAN_BUILD_DEPENDS += lang/flang/flang
: MODFORTRAN_LIB_DEPENDS += lang/flang/flang
:
:
:--
:jca
:
--
Westheimer's Discovery:
A couple of months in the laboratory can frequently save a
couple of hours in the library.
