On 2024/02/15 14:20, Theo Buehler wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 12:42:44PM +0000, Klemens Nanni wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 01:37:17PM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote: > > > Even if you nuke this port, could you try to get a backtrace? SIGILL > > > might be an IBT issue we need to track down. > > > > Core was generated by `QSyncthingTray'. > > Program terminated with signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction. > > #0 0x00000a91ec9cd860 in ?? () > > [Current thread is 1 (process 609315)] > > #0 0x00000a91ec9cd860 in ?? () > > #1 0x00000a9135f203df in vmEntryToJavaScript () from > > /usr/local/lib/libJavaScriptCore.so.0.0 > > #2 0x00000a9135eb6c8e in JSC::JITCode::execute(JSC::VM*, > > JSC::ProtoCallFrame*) () from /usr/local/lib/libJavaScriptCore.so.0.0 > > This does smell a bit like 'NOBTCFI = Yes' could "fix" this... > > If I understood correctly, we need to keep x11/qt5/qtwebkit for the time > being, so someone with IBT hw should probably hunt this down. This might > be a starting point: > > https://github.com/WebKit/Webkit/blob/main/Source/JavaScriptCore/llint/LowLevelInterpreter.asm
FWIW ports using it via py-qt5 should be happy, because lang/python has USE_NOBTCFI=Yes (for this exact reason). > More importantly, is there a qt6 equivalent of this code that people > could keep hitting for a longer time? Qt6 only has qtwebengine (mostly chromium, using a similar set of patches as www/chromium), no qtwebkit there.
