On Wed, Aug 02 2023, Sebastien Marie <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 11:38:40AM +0200, Omar Polo wrote:
>> On 2023/07/31 19:02:58 +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> > 
>> > Hi folks,
>> > 
>> > [...]
>> > 
>> > I have already spent time on this yesterday.  While I can understand
>> > that you love your emacs being up to date, I'm maintaining this port
>> > and I would have three proposals to compare with my own wip diff.
>> > So let's hope that said diff addresses all the points mentioned in this
>> > thread...
>> > 
>> > The two main points open to discussion IMO:
>> > 
>> > 1. sqlite3: it doesn't seem to add any feature besides being able to
>> > access sqlite databases from emacs.  So I'm not sure it's worth adding
>> > another explicit dep...
>> > 
>> > 2. tree-sitter: I won't add it right now, since it uses rust at build
>> > time and I want emacs to stay available on as many architectures as
>> > possible.  I have a wip diff to make rust optional in
>> > textproc/tree-sitter, but that can wait until emacs-29.1 is properly
>> > tested and committed.
>> > 
>> > All flavors build-tested on amd64, no_x11 flavor build-tested on sparc64
>> > and running on amd64.
>> > 
>> > Test reports & oks welcome, especially for graphical flavors.
>> 
>> I've used for a day the athena flavor, works fine for me.  (right now
>> I'm using the 'lucid' flavor that I added locally.)  fwiw ok op@
>
> as op@, I am using it (but with gtk3). no problem seen. ok semarie@

Thank you folk, committed!

-- 
jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF  DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7EE

Reply via email to