Re: RFC: LOCK_CMD

[Marc Espie]

On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 08:21:14AM -0400, Josh Grosse wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 02:10:44PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> > Does anyone out there uses a lock command that's not the `default' one
> > in infrastructure/build/dolock ?
> 
> Does /usr/bin/touch count as non-default?  For several years, I've been
> using that, as ports(7) says to assign LOCK_CMD a value along with LOCKDIR
> and UNLOCK_CMD.
Yes, touch counts as non-default. Plus, touch is bogus. It doesn't lock
anything.