* Martynas Venckus wrote: > > py-psycopg is in the ports tree, why did you not update that one? > > Because it *is* psycopg2; it is not an update. > > - apis are incompatible; > - the module is "psycopg2"; > > Some applications do have quirks to check for psycopg and psycopg2, > but some just insist psycopg2 (that was turbogears in my case). > > > why did you not update that one? > > I did not want to break the applications that depend on psycopg. > > > Now we py-psycopg and py-psycopg2. > > Yes that has been done intentionally.
ok, then all is fine ;) thanks for the clarifications (which of course, would have been worth mentioning in the committ message).
