On 2022/02/18 15:26, Mark Patruck wrote: > On 18.02.2022 10:11, Alexander Hall wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Lately I've seen ports@ email in my spam folder, if they contain > > "bad.port.mk", since apparently "port.mk" is considered a domain name, and > > a harmful such, too. > > > > I've tried to whitelist "bad.port.mk" but it does not seem to help. > > > > I'm assuming this might be a common issue for other ports@ subscribers, so > > if anyone has any suggested remedy, is be happy to hear it. > > > > /Alexander > > No issues here with ports@ mails. I've also checked the symbol table > for scanned mails (rspamc analyse), but didn't find a bigger increase > of the final score due to potential spam. > > Out of interest...what does your scan results say for relevant mails?
It hit gonzalo's nextcloud updates the other day. Relevant bit on mine was URIBL_BLACK(7.50)[port.mk:url];
