Stuart Henderson wrote:
> "doesn't work for a long time" isn't correct, as Fred showed.

I should have added "for most people", as wi(4) devices are rare 
nowadays. But yes, it works for these.

> On 19 October 2021 07:44:23 Stefan Hagen <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Solene Rapenne wrote:
> > > On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 18:29:15 +0200
> > > Solene Rapenne <[email protected]>:
> > > 
> > > > the gkrellm plugin gkrellmwireless is looking for wi* interfaces
> > > > and a poor attempt at adding iwm0 to the list make it crash.
> > > >
> > > > it's useless for people with no wi hardware and I'm not even
> > > > sure it would still work.
> > > >
> > > > The port sysutils/gkrellm/plugins/wireless is in its 10th
> > > > revision, HOMEPAGE is 404, MASTER_SITES is 404 too.
> > > >
> > > > If someone with a wi hardware could check if it works for them that
> > > > would be great, otherwise I'd propose removal of that port.
> > > >
> > > 
> > > ping, i propose removal
> > 
> > +1 ok for removal from my side
> > 
> > It doesn't work for a long time and nobody complained.
> > 
> > - Stefan

Reply via email to