On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 09:49:03AM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> New diff, where I only changed the debug stuff (and introduced a
> new typedef for it). The reason I didn't touch the other message
> printing functions is that they call printf(3)-like functions several
> times and don't do any error checking at all, and it's not clear
> what to do with those functions.
BTW, to test this, run a haskell binary (which might have been
compiled with -threaded and -rtsopts) with options
+RTS -s --internal-counters
or
+RTS -sFILE --internal-counters.
the former uses the vdebugBelcn() case, the latter writes the
statistics into the file FILE.
The "interesting" part is this part of the output, because that is
where I killed the %n:
gen[0].sync 0 0
gen[1].sync 0 0
I've tested that both variants (without and with an output file)
still work, so there is no regression.
Ciao,
Kili
