Omar Polo <[email protected]> writes:
> Hello ports,
>
> I wanted to play with lua and ended up needing luarocks. I tried to
> resurrect the luarocks ports on openbsd-wip by abieber@ and cschutijser.
> With this I was able to install (locally) and use things like luasocket
> or dkjson, and even lua-lsp ^^
>
> I'm not sure about the FLAVORS bit, and I'm surely doing something wrong
> with the PKGNAME
>
> % cd /usr/ports/packages/amd64
> % find all -type f -name '*lua*'
> all/luarocks-3.7.0.tgz
> all/lua53rocks-3.7.0.tgz
> all/lua52rocks-3.7.0.tgz
>
> but otherwise seems functional. I opted to rename the `luarocks' and
> `luarocks-admin' executables so multiple flavors can be installed at the
> same time (seems useful).
>
> I'll try to upstream patch-src_luarocks_core_cfg_lua eventually.
>
> Thoughts/comments?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Omar Polo
>
Here's an updated port with:
- taking MAINTAINER (if nobody objects it)
- fixed PKGNAME, now it generates
% find all -type f -name '*lua*'
all/luarocks-3.7.0-lua52.tgz
all/luarocks-3.7.0-lua53.tgz
all/luarocks-3.7.0-lua51.tgz
all/luarocks-3.7.0.tgz
- followed what alpine does with the renaming: `luarocks' and
`luarocks-admin' are luarocks-${MODLUA_VERSION} and
luarocks-admin-${MODLUA_VERSION}
The only doubt I still have is regarding the flavors: what's the point
of generating two equivalent packages? (luarocks and luarocks-lua51)
Cheers,
