Hi,
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 07:37:41AM -0800, Greg Steuck wrote:
> >> However, I'm not sure wether devel/cabal is the right place for
> >> cabal.port.mk. Shouldn't modules-only files to be put into
> >> infrastructure/mk?
> >>
> >> What do other ports people think?
> >
> > We have the same for devel/cargo, lang/go, lang/python and others.
> > For gcc the main module is in lang/gcc/8 but there's a helper in
> > infrastructure/mk because it (sometimes) needs to select between
> > different gcc versions.
> >
> > I'm fairly happy having it in the main ports tree, but if it is
> > placed elsewhere then the others should probably move there too.
>
> FWIW, I chose this placement after lang/ghc/ghc.port.mk. We could
> bikeshed devel/cabal{-install}/cabal{-install}.port.mk aspect of it :)
No. If Stuart is happy with it, just commit it as
devel/cabal/cabal.port.mk.
The devel/happy update is ok for me, too.
Ciao,
Kili
