On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 12:52:31PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote: > > Hi > > > > Jasper, Mikolaj Kucharski and I have recently started (again) updating > > our really outdated Gnome stuff. > > > > Feel free to fetch ports that we have updated/created sofar: > > > > http://atlantilde.com/~alek/ports/mystuff-gnome.tar.gz > > > > There is not too much to test yet, only platform section from Gnome FTP > > Guys, this is not going anywhere. > > Why do you insist on trying to update everything at once, and force a > huge update on people ? > > Back when you were not around, robert and I did some *real progress* on > gnome update. How did we do that ? We selected some specific stuff, and > imported it. > > I could look at what you've done, and try to decipher how to handle it. > > But this is *NOT* proper development work. > > How come I don't get real feedback on dbus ? what's the state of the dbus > in your tarball ? > > What's up with fam ? why is it part of the gnome update ? this is a mostly > independent library, and having fam around will have BIG consequences, > including for KDE. > > > What do we start with ? > gtk+ ? > pango ? > dbus ? > fam ? > > You are not doing this in any reasonable manner. i guess we realized this and this is how i think we should continue.
first we should focus on the major libraries, think glib2, pango and gtk+2. meanwhile/later we should get the other "minor" libraries updated/imported. after this is done we should finish it off with the client/desktop stuff. anyone agrees? cheers, jasper -- ``This statement is false'' NedBSD: http://nedbsd.eu
