Chris Kuethe [2006-03-31, 13:11:39]: > On 3/31/06, Ian Darwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Nikolay Sturm wrote: > > > > > > Personally, I am not a big fan of new categories. Last ones (biology and > > > telephony) were not that successful. > > > > > > > > Yet. :-) > > > > But they are better than putting everything that comes along in misc. > > so maybe GIS is a little too narrow, but maybe putting stuff that > deals with geography, locations, places in "geo"? 5 different earth or > globe packages in two different categories - why? > > i can understand www/mod_geoip as that's strictly a www module, but > GeoIP seems like it should live in geo. It takes a key and gives you > back a value, where the key just happens to look a lot like an IP > address, and the value has a reasonable chance of being a place on > earth. > > i'm not sure tools designed for working with information about places > on earth should belong in astronomy.
indeed, astronomy would not be appropriate. i think "geography" could be added. steven Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
