On Saturday 03 December 2005 03:00 pm, Peter Hessler wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 09:20:09 -0500
>
> Kurt Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> : On Friday 02 December 2005 08:39 am, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> : > Peter Strömberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> : > > We'll have to add --enable-official-branding to CONFIGURE_ARGS
> : > > to get the right brand.dtd file.
> : >
> : > Yes, with that I get "Firefox".
> :
> : Unfortunately, we can't use  --enable-official-branding without
> : permission from moz.org. They have started to enforce their
> : trademarks. We can use "Firefox Community Edition" branding in the
> : mean time. See:
> :
> : http://www.mozilla.org/foundation/trademarks/policy.html
> : http://www.mozilla.org/foundation/trademarks/l10n-policy.html
>
> I thought we had permission to use --enable-official-branding.  At
> least thats how I interpret change 1.26 of the Makefile.

Actually no permission was asked for that commit. AFAIK, it didn't 
change the branding or useage of moz.org trademarked names and images.
I believe at that time they were not taking steps to protect them.

What the commit did was enable the build_number to be generated and 
embeded into firefox. The build_number is a requirement for firefox to 
be able to detect when a users profile needs to be automaticly 
upgraded.

-Kurt

Reply via email to