Hi,

I'm trying to get some more attention to the 'trimming_ignore' error in the pkg 
building cluster.

See latest 141releng-armv7-quarterly failure: 
https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/ampere1/.

The part of the logs about this error are not public (AFAIK). So could somebody 
with access take a look what is happening?

Regards,
Ronald.


Van: Mark Millard <mark...@yahoo.com>
Datum: zaterdag, 11 januari 2025 04:21
Aan: Ronald Klop <ronald-li...@klop.ws>, FreeBSD Mailing List 
<freebsd-po...@freebsd.org>
Onderwerp: RE: pkg build FreeBSD:13:armv7_latest failing with trimming_ignore

Ronald Klop <ronald-lists_at_klop.ws> wrote on
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 08:23:53 UTC :

> Looking at https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/builds?all=1&type=package all 
builds for 'default' and 13[34]releng-armv7 are failing with status 'trimming_ignore'. 
This started on December 15.
> I hoped it was a glitch but it keeps happening.
>
> Looking at https://www.klop.ws/pkgstats/pkg-age.html it is also obvious that 
FreeBSD:13:armv7_latest is a bit off. :-)
>
> Search for 'trimming_ignore' on the pkg-status page I saw that 
141releng-armv7 and main-armv7 had this issue also once or twice, but a follow-up 
build succeeded.
>
> Does anybody have an insight on the cause (and solution) of this 
trimming_ignore state?


I'll note that the first example of this is from back on 2024-Dec-03:

default quarterly 141releng-armv7 257d1c796954 0 0 0 733 1456 -2189 
trimming_ignore: Tue, 03 Dec 2024 13:31:50 GMT 00:04:34 ampere1

That is: quarterly, 14.1, on ampere1

Not being all that old, it seems to be associated with some sort of fairly 
recent change.

The 2024-Dec-03 failure is 41 armv7 build attempts ago (if I counted right). It 
is one of the 8 such failures so far. So, usually the build attempts do not get 
this problem. (Racy failure?)

So far, there are examples of each of:

Quarterly: 13.3, 14.1
Latest:    13.3, 13.4, main

An implication is that all 3 of ampere[1-3] have had it happen.

So, what changed that applies to all 3 ampere* machines?

An interesting oddity is the elapsed time's ranges over the 8 failures:

Shortest: 00:04:08
Longest:  00:17:58

But looking at which machine separately:

ampere1 (so: quarterly):
Shortest: 00:04:08
Longest:  00:05:41

ampere3 (so latest --but not main)
Shortest: 00:07:56
Longest:  00:08:42

ampere2 (just one example for main, which is an example of latest)
Shortest: 00:17:58
Longest:  00:17:58

===
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com



Reply via email to