On 02/01/25 01:38, Tomoaki AOKI wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jan 2025 19:50:50 +0100
Guido Falsi <madpi...@freebsd.org> wrote:
Don't see a good reason to force everyone to use an old version.
Anyway the ports tree is open source, nothing stops anyone from
proposing (with himself as maintainer) a new port for the old version
calling it "ghostwriter-qt5" or whatever.
Or flavorizing with qt5/kf5 version alone stick with latest possible
(older than ones for qt6/kf6) version until KDE6 becomes default
on ports.
I'm not sure putting VERSION under flavors control is
supported/suggested. Would make managing the port quite more complicated
anyway.
A separate port for the older version would be more reasonable, the name
I suggested for such a port it is also suboptimal. The name should have
at least an indication this is an old version.
Best regards!
--
Guido Falsi <madpi...@freebsd.org>
