On 19. Dec 2024, at 22:26, Daniel Engberg <daniel.engberg.li...@pyret.net> wrote:
This PR was opened on 2024-11-28. You committed a patch mentioning it a week later, so it might very well look like you fixed the problem (which is what I thought at first when seeing it). Apparently that was a reference error (accidental, I assume).
This PR is eight days old by now and it’s Christmas/Holiday season, so it certainly won’t hit maintainer timeout on Christmas Eve or the holiday week in general. I would say, acting in good faith, maintainer timeout should be delayed by at least one or two additional weeks on this one. Lining up PRs preparing for a timeout and making a maintainer change part of that, strategically planing ahead to commit the very moment the right number of days has passed, doesn’t seem like an ingenious way of cooperating with your fellow project members to me. Best Michael |
- Looking for testers for curl - PR 283266 Daniel Engberg
- Re: Looking for testers for curl - PR 283266 Michael Gmelin
- Re: Looking for testers for curl - PR 283266 Daniel Engberg
- Re: Looking for testers for curl - PR 283266 Daniel Engberg
- Re: Looking for testers for curl - PR 283266 Michael Gmelin
- Re: Looking for testers for curl - PR 2832... Daniel Engberg
- Re: Looking for testers for curl - PR... Michael Gmelin
- Re: Looking for testers for curl ... Daniel Engberg
- Re: Looking for testers for c... Michael Gmelin
- Re: Looking for testers for curl ... Charlie Li
- Re: Looking for testers for curl - PR... Michael Gmelin